|
Post by crystalman101 on Sept 25, 2007 18:02:28 GMT -5
Should we?
|
|
|
Post by Flareon350 on Sept 25, 2007 19:22:42 GMT -5
I vote the 2nd one.
|
|
|
Post by tropicaleus on Sept 26, 2007 9:51:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Flareon350 on Sept 26, 2007 19:42:03 GMT -5
Now if we are going to have new pokémon, how many should we have?
|
|
|
Post by crystalman101 on Sept 26, 2007 22:47:13 GMT -5
Well, in RS a third of the pokemon were original, so I think 2/3 of them should be new.
|
|
|
Post by Flareon350 on Sept 27, 2007 19:50:22 GMT -5
2/3 sounds good to me.
|
|
|
Post by Calamari Mushroom on Sept 28, 2007 4:31:19 GMT -5
Maybe 3/5?
|
|
|
Post by tropicaleus on Sept 28, 2007 10:05:22 GMT -5
2/3 for me.
|
|
|
Post by Flareon350 on Sept 28, 2007 19:43:44 GMT -5
I like 2/3 or 3/4 better.
3/5 and 2/3 are the same thing.
|
|
|
Post by crystalman101 on Oct 23, 2007 1:54:19 GMT -5
I like 2/3 or 3/4 better. 3/5 and 2/3 are the same thing. 2/3 and 4/6 are the same.
|
|
|
Post by Flareon350 on Oct 23, 2007 21:40:17 GMT -5
4/6 where did that come from?
|
|
|
Post by crystalman101 on Oct 23, 2007 23:00:13 GMT -5
you said 3/5 but 4/6 are the same.
|
|
|
Post by Flareon350 on Oct 24, 2007 21:11:25 GMT -5
Oh. I meant to say ALMOST THE SAME
|
|
|
Post by 1pokemon1 on Oct 30, 2007 16:51:46 GMT -5
I voted the 2nd one can I help?
|
|
|
Post by crystalman101 on Oct 30, 2007 18:47:38 GMT -5
We'd love it if you help!
|
|